Where does one start, about violence? With a rhetorical question like that, I
guess. I will be told that violence is a
primeval, necessary, ineradicable part of the human condition and vital for
survival. And indeed I have to admit
that living intentionally and mindfully without violence, as I try to do, is rather
the exception. It is seen as a
curiosity.
In my octogenarian years I have come to the view that
human society reels and staggers from the effects of testosterone. We can start with contact sport – although I
immediately interpose that I have just read an article about chess, in the
Guardian, in which the writer, who is preparing a book about championship
chess, not a team sport, admits that the object of chess is bloody, to destroy
your opponent. The aim in a friendly
game down at the pub is the same, to defeat someone else.
The language in which sports are now reported reflects
all this. Opponents were smashed,
destroyed, annihilated, cut down… There
is much more by way of example, but I can’t bring myself to read sports reports
to garner more examples of the violent speech which now seems standard.
Knowing nothing as I do about the rules and practice
of team sports such as rugby, league, netball, hockey, even cricket, it seems
to me that aggression and violence, proscribed by gentlemanly rules in my
youth, are now not only winked at but expected and enjoyed. Violence in contact sports now regularly
spills over into the off-field misbehaviour of sporting icons and role-models,
fuelled by alcohol and drugs, resulting in drunken brawls and attacks on
women. Much of it is routinely excused
one way or another. “Letting off steam”
covers a multitude of sins.
The world looks on in dismay and disgust as hordes of travelling
team supporters from the UK or Australia typically, foul-mouthed and ignorant,
stalk the streets and football venues in other lands, hurling abuse and
urinating their contempt for decency.
Most of this however is child’s play compared to what
I view with horror each day on Al Jazeera, BBC or CNN. How many tens of thousands of young men,
testosterone flowing freely, are currently rampaging around Egypt, Libya,
Nigeria, Chad, Mali, Tunisia, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Ethiopia, Iraq, Syria,
Lebanon… Ukraine… to name a few places?
What you need are battle fatigues, a Toyota ute with some kind of
ordnance mounted on the back, and an assault weapon in your hand which you
brandish while you shout what in a politer age we called epithets.
Presumably all these blokes believe they are in some
righteous cause. Whatever their problems,
violence is apparently the way to fix it.
They shoot you. They believe
Allah is pleased. Some of them commit
atrocities – I forced myself to watch the unedited video of the beheading of 20
Coptic Christians on a beach in Libya. I
have no words to compass my disgust.
Violence was bringing its own deep satisfactions for these people. Testosterone and power on one side,
humiliation and pain on the other.
Now the victims of male violence include vast camps of
hopelessness, women and children rendered homeless, terrorised, sent wandering
and starving.
Back at home, here where I live in this peaceful land,
there are still children and babies brought to hospital with smashed heads or
broken arms or ribs. Women still get
attacked at home, injured and raped.
Testosterone rules, along with beer and sport and the mate culture. One aspect of all this less often told is the
violence of the Pacific Island culture.
The ranks will close to conceal women who have been thrashed. It is considered normal and necessary for
children to be whipped.
I have no solutions, except personally to forswear
violence in action and speech. If violent attitudes at least are an
addiction, then help may be needed. But
it can be done. I think we can live
without violence.
No comments:
Post a Comment